Review: Jim Beam Black XA Extra Aged Kentucky Straight Bourbon (2015)

jim beam black extra agedWhile I wasn’t paying attention, Jim Beam quietly updated its venerable Black Label bottling. What was once bottled with an 8 Year Old (“Double Aged”) age statement now carries none. Beam assures me the product in the new bottle is the same as the old Jim Beam Black Label even if the exterior isn’t quite the same. Either way, we got a fresh bottle of XA to offer some 2015 perspective. Thoughts follow.

Jim Beam XA is, as the name implies, a seemingly well aged spirit. A bit of sawdust on the nose leads into notes of fruity apple, cloves, and vanilla ice cream. The palate offers a rich and creamy body, loaded with caramel, vanilla, and some charcoal notes. That lumberyard character sustains here, and some popcorn notes come along as a reprise. The finish is lasting and warming and a bit dusty, for the most part offering a tour of some of bourbondom’s most classic flavors without piling on a whole lot of distracting nuance. In other words: There’s nothing you won’t enjoy here, but it’s short of a standout, too.

86 proof.

B+ / $20 /

Similar Posts:

7 Responses

  1. JM May 31, 2015 / 11:41 am

    Just to clarify.. does this have an actual age statement? I don’t see one on the pictured bottle

  2. Christopher Null May 31, 2015 / 1:42 pm

    No, I tried to make that clear with the second sentence of the review. No Age Statement.

  3. beau June 14, 2015 / 2:01 pm

    Great article Christopher. Jim Beam has a great public relations dept and has answered several questions for me over the years. But…when this product came out and I asked about the 8 years v. the new label they only assured me that JB makes a quality product. Hmmm… Yesterday at Spec’s (story in San Antonio) a bourbon “expert” told me JB is trying to stretch product and the new XA is only 6 yrs old. I think I used to buy a green JB labeled bottle that was 6 yrs old. I don’t know if this is true or not but it pushed me to by the last bottle of 1.75 JB labeled 8 yrs.

  4. Christopher Null June 14, 2015 / 2:31 pm

    The Spec’s guy would have no way of knowing that — though he could very well be right. Who knows?

  5. Don R June 3, 2016 / 7:18 pm

    I saw on the internet somewhere that they are said to use lot’s of barrel’s that are stored in the higher shelves in the warehouse since there is more heat in those areas and because of that, the bourbon ages faster. Supposedly the flavor profile is the same as the 8 year old product of Jim Beam Black. As long as the flavor profile stays the same, I don’t care, but a lot of these really large companies seem to sacrifice quality over quantity. I hope that doesn’t happen with this product.

  6. Mike June 6, 2016 / 5:32 pm

    Got a first bottle for 16 dollars. Not bad for the price, not bad at all.

  7. JB June 7, 2016 / 11:17 am

    A few years back I bought some JB Black in Europe. Instead of the “double aged” 8 year whiskey, this one was “triple aged” for 6 years (*compared to the 2 year standard for bourbon). This marketing trickery makes me dubious of the new “extra aged” labeling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.