Monthly Archives: October 2011

Review: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection 2011 Edition

We’ve been writing about Buffalo Trace’s awe-inspiring Antique Collection for longer than I can remember, and each year it seems like these five Bourbons are better than the last time out. This year that streak seems to be taking a breather, with a mixed bag of very good and merely “OK” whiskeys.

I’d still drink any of these in a pinch but, hey, every year can’t be a masterpiece!

Sazerac Rye 18 Year Old – If you like rye you’re going to love this rendition. Massively intense on the nose, it screams on the palate with heavy middle Eastern spices, toffee, and lacy smokiness. Could use a touch more sweetness to lighten up the finish, but on the whole it’s yet another winner from Sazerac. 90 proof. A-

Eagle Rare 17 Year Old Bourbon – Actually 18 years, 7 months old. Not much of a nose here, and for a 17-year-old whiskey the palate is on the mild side. If I didn’t know better I’d swear this was a younger spirit, and while the flavor — caramel, vanilla, a touch of chocolate — is there, it lacks the austerity that this whiskey usually brings to the table. 90 proof. B+

George T. Stagg Bourbon – Nobody doesn’t like George Stagg, and this burly monster is again ultra-hot — 142.6 proof — and redolent of deeply charred wood and coffee beans. Bruising and tough, it unfortunately lacks the nuance that prior years of Stagg have brought to the table. The 2011 edition I’m frankly finding tough to crack. The soothing finishing sweetness that usually comes with a solid Stagg release just doesn’t happen here. This makes Drinkhacker sad. B

William Larue Weller Bourbon – Smells innocuous, but as with many a Weller of yore, the palate of this wheated Bourbon burns with intense cinnamon notes — almost like red hots candy. Again the finish doesn’t gel the way I’d like, more bitter than bittersweet, and incompletely satisfying. Weller’s never been my favorite of this collection. 133.5 proof. B

Thomas H. Handy Sazerac Rye – Curious: The palate is immediately redolent of not grain or wood notes but licorice, making this an oddball installment in the lineup. Fortunately you’ll also find lots of sweet caramel and spicy rye notes here, giving it a lot of flavor. With plenty of heft at 128.8 proof, it doesn’t pull punches, but it’s perhaps a bit too young to really compete with the big boys. (That said, this year perhaps Handy’s youth is its greatest asset.) B+

about $70 each / greatbourbon.com

2011 buffalo trace Antique Collection family shot Review: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection 2011 Edition

Drinkhacker 2011 Wine Cheat Sheet / Vintage Chart

For five years we’ve been offering this fun little freebie: A chart that tells you which years are good, which are great, and which are lesser in the world of wine. Just print it out (it’s best if you have a color printer but works either way), fold it into threes, and stick into your purse or wallet next to the cash you’re wondering whether you should spend on that hot bottle of vino.

As always, here’s how to use the cheat sheet: Only the last two digits of a year are included to save space, and the list only rarely reaches back into the pre-WWII era, so assume anything you see starting with a zero to be from this century.

All years listed here are considered good to great vintages, but those in green with underlining are the cream of the crop, “classic” years that you should consider the very best on the market. (Why green and underlined? So you can tell the difference whether you use a color or black & white printer.)

Check back next October for the next revision of the cheat sheet!

Cheers!

Drinkhacker.com wine cheat sheet download options:

drinkhacker-vintage-chart [DOC]

drinkhacker-vintage-chart [PDF]

Review: 2006 Tenuta Rocca Barolo DOCG

Tenuta Rocca’s Barolo has one thing going for it that almost all other Barolos lack: Affordability.

At just $35 a bottle (on deep discount), you’re getting top, DOCG-level quality at a price cheaper than most mid-grade California Cabs.

Oh, how does it taste? Great. While initially restrained, a few minutes in the glass opens up the wine, revealing intense fresh herbal notes — rosemary and thyme — plus a fun licorice kick in the end. The body is full and round without being flabby. While so much Italian wine can come across as tough, astringent, and bitter, this is a Piedmontese vino (based on Nebbiolo grapes, in case you’re wondering) with rare and exceptional balance.

A / $35 / [BUY TENUTA ROCCA BAROLO HERE]

tenuta rocca barolo 525x315 Review: 2006 Tenuta Rocca Barolo DOCG

Review: Smirnoff Coconut Vodka

What’s that? You want more nutty vodka flavors? You got it!

Here’s a coconut monster from Smirnoff, one of the big producers of flavored vodkas.

Clear, unlike UV’s milky white oddity, Smirnoff again shows that when it comes to coconut, the natural companion is rum, not vodka. There’s something about these two that just doesn’t seem to play well together: The coconut just can’t be sweetened enough to cut through the vodka’s harshness.

Here, the bite of the vodka is distracting, a too-strong burn that plays poorly with the tropical fruit. (It’s a fruit, right?) The nose is spot-on, but on the palate, the coconut character is very short and indistinct, the finish leaving you not with a hint of the islands but rather a nod to Mother Russia. Strange.

70 proof.

B- / $14 / smirnoff.com

smirnoff coconut Review: Smirnoff Coconut Vodka

Review: Johnnie Walker Double Black Scotch Whisky

Johnnie Walker, like the rest of the whisky industry, is betting on black. Twice.

Formerly available only as a duty-free product, the company is (today) releasing as a limited edition a new blended Scotch called “Double Black,” a more heavily wooded and smoke-infused version of its classic Black Label — for my money, Walker’s best label. Actually, that’s a bit of a misnomer, since Double Black (which, by the way, carries no age statement) doesn’t much resemble Black Label at all. It’s a new and separate blend of whisky stocks, including peated whisky and whisky aged in heavy-char barrels, and bottled at 80 proof.

The result, if you’re familiar with Johnnie Walker, is bizarre: At first blush, heavily peated in comparison to the other whiskys in the Walker line. Certainly it’s mild in comparison to, say, Ardbeg, but it’s a whisky that lets you know its smoky intentions up front, no question.

That said, Walker isn’t a brand known for peat and smoke, and Double Black isn’t really playing to the company’s strengths. The sweet, tree-fruit, and nougat-like character that Black Label is known for gets unfortunately muddied under the smokiness here. It’s not bad — but Double Black has a bit of an identity crisis, not sure if it wants to be a smoked-up sweet bomb or a sweetened rendition of a peaty Scotch. Walker didn’t land on either one, and fans of both styles of whiskys are unlikely to be thrilled here.

Still, kudos to Walker for stepping into the peat world, however erratically. As I said, this is a drinkable dram: It just needs to reimagine this approach with a little more balance in mind.

B / $40 / johnniewalker.com

Johnnie Walker Double Black Review: Johnnie Walker Double Black Scotch Whisky

Tasting the Wagner Family of Wine

Best known for producing Caymus — a Napa Cab which gained a massive following over the last 10 years, especially with its “Special Selection” bottling (tragically not reviewed here) — the Wagner family actually produces wine under a multitude of labels. We tried six, courtesy of a TastingPanel.com kit of minis sent our way.  Notes follow.

2009 Mer Soleil “Silver” Unoaked Chardonnay Santa Lucia Highlands – A fresh white with big pineapple, fig, and some lemon notes. More buttery than you’d expect from an unoaked Chardonnay, but still lively. B+ / $22

2008 Mer Soleil Chardonnay Santa Lucia Highlands – Now, the barrel-fermented version, an oaky bomb that feels quite heavy on the alcohol. Surprising fruit flavor is a bit at odds with some green, unripened notes, but overall it’s a reasonably well-balanced and drinkable, modern Chardonnay. B / $32

2009 Conundrum California – One of my perennial favorite white wines (a blend of Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Viognier, Muscat, and another mystery grape, all sourced from all over the state), the former Caymus-branded Conundrum in 2009 is a bit on the medicinal side, heavy with what tastes like a lot of Chenin Blanc character. Opens up and balances itself a bit as you drink it, but it’s not Conundrum’s greatest hit. B+ / $22

2009 Meiomi Pinot Noir (not pictured) – Quite thin and overly fruited, this Pinot, from a blend of grapes all over California, doesn’t really gel. Tastes very young and undercooked. Clearly a value play. C+ / $22

2009 Belle Glos Pinot Noir Santa Maria Valley – A much better Pinot for not a huge investment, this So Cal wine offers traditional, vibrant and lightly tart cherry notes, and a clean finish. A- / $44

2008 Caymus Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley – This is the wine which I owe my oenophilia to, having downed many a bottle back in the mid-’90s, when Caymus was readily available for $20 a bottle. Now a minor cult classic, it’s showing its age a bit, with ruddy, lightly raisiny notes, and a slightly flabby body. Still a winner, though. B+ / $68

wagner family of wines Tasting the Wagner Family of Wine