Monthly Archives: July 2011

Book Review: Bettane & Desseauve’s Guide to the Wines of France

Bettane Desseauves Guide to the Wines of France 155x300 Book Review: Bettane & Desseauves Guide to the Wines of FranceFrance is probably the most complicated wine region in the world, full of viticultural areas that not only are most consumers unable to locate on a map, but which they can’t even pronounce.

The thick and unwieldy Bettane & Desseauve’s Guide to the Wines of France will be of little help to most drinkers, an 831-page behemoth that’s as difficult to hold open as it is to navigate. Almost entirely comprised of ratings of wines from hundreds of different chateaux, the book is indeed a guide to the very wines of France and is not a hand-holding introduction to what French wine is all about.

That’s fine, but organization represents a long-term challenge for this book, as finding a producer will test the patience of even experience wine drinkers. Wineries are split up by geography, and Bordeaux, say, is divided into its various sub-regions. If you’re looking for a specific producer (which is really the only reason anyone would open this tome) the goose chase begins in earnest. Hope you understand the peculiarities of French proper names: Chateau La Tour Figeac, for example, can be found alphabetized after Etablissements Thunevin (both are under “T”), and only then will you find them if you know they are Right Bank Bordeaux.

This is, by all accounts, the “correct” way to alphabetize a winery, but without good signposting it won’t mean much to most. The index is more help, dispensing with all the preamble and alphabetizing by whomever’s last name is on the label, but only if don’t make the mistake of looking at the second index, which is again organized by appellation and sub-appellation, basically just repeating the organization of the main text.

Another challenge comes int he form of the book’s odd design: 11 inches tall and just 5 5/8 inches wide, it is the shape of a pocket book but, at 2 inches thick, will not fit in any pocket you have. The odd shape makes it hard to hold open for long and impossible to lay down without using something heavy to keep it from closing on you. Sticklers will also find that the binding breaks within minutes of first opening it.

All in all Bettane and Desseauve are comprehensive in cataloging the world of French wine (though, as with many of these books, their ratings hover around a very narrowly-defined area), but better books about the wines of France can be found.

B- / $26 / [BUY IT HERE]

Dispatches from Aspen Food & Wine Classic 2011

“Is this your first Classic?”

It was a question I’d hear more than once over the three days I spent in Aspen last month at what has become the pre-eminent annual food and wine event in America. Emphasis on food. In a single evening I encountered Mario Batali, Jacques Pepin, Jose Andres (who personally prepared the salt-crusted grilled prawn I ate while berating someone for disturbing his onions), and Andrew Zimmern (who heroically saved me from a deadly spider).

A few weeks later, so much of the Classic, hosted by Food & Wine magazine and an event of absurdly high expense to those who pay to attend it, is now but a blur. Is it the Aspen elevation? The long days of seminars and tasting sessions? Or simply the mountain of business cards I now have to follow up on that makes the whole thing seem so daunting in retrospect?

Structurally the Classic sounds like an easy-to-manage thing. For two and a half days, the schedule (basically) runs like this: Sessions (there are a dozen food, wine, or spirits-focused seminars to choose from) start at 10, then the grand tasting event (more on that later) is open for a couple of hours after that. The tent shuts down for a while to allow for more sessions, then it reopens in the afternoon, closing promptly around 6 o’clock so dinners can be had and the parties can begin. Depending on who you know there may be a half dozen to chose from each night.

Friday and Saturday are “full” days, and Sunday is a lighter one, as most people try to get home, fast (not an easy feat from remote Aspen, Colorado).

“The tent” — the grand tasting pavilion — is , for most people, the centerpiece of their experience here. Hundreds of exhibitors represent wineries around the world, spirits sellers, food merchants, kitchenware purveyors, restaurants, even countries hoping to get tourists, cruise ships, car companies, and just about anything else have a booth. Everyone is either pouring or cooking: A quick spin through a fraction of the tent will have you noshing on Korean noodles, sashimi, barbeque, chocolate, salad, root beer, and pork rinds — and probably in that order. While there’s plenty of supermarket brand stuff being poured here, a lot of it is upscale, sometimes extremely so. While there were many fabulous wines (including a whole sub-tent devoted to Spanish wine), I found the spirits purveyors to be the most rewarding: Casa Dragones tequila, private bottlings of all sorts of whisky from Samaroli (see pics), and Ron Cooper personally pouring just about all of his company’s Del Maguey mezcals, including the bizarre but fantastic Pechuga (which is made with a whole chicken breast), of which only 650 bottles were made. I probably looped back to Cooper’s table four times over the two days I was in the tent.

The seminars should not be underestimated. I attended two great ones: One tasting the audience members on old wines dating back to 1980, and another comparing Oregon and California Pinot Noirs of various vintages and regions. (Discovery: I liked southern California Pinot the best of these.) If you’re more into cooking, copious celebrity chef-led demonstrations are available, as are sessions dedicated to all levels of expertise.

Then there are the parties, and one finds that in the tiny town of Aspen, it’s easy to hop from a Macallan event to a tasting of two vintages of Penfolds Grange in a manner of minutes. (The 2006 Grange stands as my favorite wine tasted the entire weekend.) Everywhere you go, someone’s cooking a whole pig or three (as with the Wines of Spain party), or pouring something surprising (as with the “Magnum” party, where several dozen large-format bottles of wines are available to try — all self-serve).

I feel fatter just writing about it.

If you’re a gourmand and you have the means (all-access tickets are over $1,000, but tent-only consumer access runs under $400 for the weekend), this is worth an excursion once in your life. Some advice if you go: Stay as close to town as you can, over-prepare for the extreme altitude (various supplements were recommended to me), and get some rest before you arrive. You’ll need it!

foodandwine.com

Review: La Rochelle Pinot Noirs

Based in the Livermore Valley in central California, La Rochelle (aka LaRochelle) is a boutique wine producer with vineyards all over the state. Specializing in Pinot Noir, the winery shows how California Pinot can exhibit a huge range of styles. Don’t let the minimalist label fool you: This is great stuff.

2008 La Rochelle Pinot Noir Sonoma Coast – Solid Pinot, full of tart cherry fruit, minimal herb character, and an abundance of fruit. Some wood tones on the finish. This wine is straightforward and unpretentious, and it all goes down easy as pie. A-

2008 La Rochelle Pinot Noir Russian River Valley – Quite tart, with a little more terroir in the body than the Somona Coast rendition. There’s a bit of mint on the nose, but otherwise it’s a mild and easy Pinot, full of light cherry fruit and a bracing acidity. A-

2007 La Rochelle Pinot Noir Santa Cruz Mountains - Note the vintage switch here — 2007 is considered a masterpiece year for California Pinot pretty much across the state. Despite the reputation, though, this is a wine that is a bit out of balance. Slightly green and with a tannic edge, it’s a bit of a bruiser, with intense notes of incense, bramble, and earth tones. Lots of wood here. A bit of a jumble of a wine and probably a better fit with a heavy meal. B

2008 La Rochelle Pinot Noir Santa Lucia Highlands Sarmento Vineyard – The only single-vineyard wine in this roundup, it’s a real gem. A good balance of thick cherry and raspberry fruit with earth tones — leather and tobacco. A very odd character in the finish is evident here, and it’s hard to place: Candied violets? It’s flowery but bittersweet… and altogether engaging. A

each $48 / lrwine.com

 Review: La Rochelle Pinot Noirs

Review: Bagrationi Sparkling Wines

Bagrationi hails from a place called Georgia. Not the state, the country, which claims to have been making wine since 5000 B.C. Today Georgia isn’t so much the winemaking empire it might have been in the age of the MerimdeGoogling “Georgia wine” mainly gets you wineries near Atlanta — but a few makers are still soldiering on. One of them is Bagrationi, which produces a few sparklers worth a look… for the novelty value if nothing else.

NV Bagrationi 1882 Classic Brut – Foamy and big-bodied, mouth-filling and lightly bittersweet, with black pepper and green vegetable overtones. Some fruit fills in the gaps, but this wine’s power provides a bit much for an aperitif. B- / $10

2007 Bagrationi 1882 Reserve Brut – More interesting and challenging, not quite as over-the-top with bubbles, but with an interesting and deep nut character, almost like having a rich cheese plate with a side of walnuts. Again the fruit is pulled back as a bittersweet edge shows its face, but overall the balance is better here. B+ / $20

bagrationiwines.com

Review: Cookies & Corks — Cookies for Wine Pairing

Pairing wine with different foods is always a fun way to experience wine. Now here’s an easy — and more fun — way to do just that: With cookies customized for different wine types.

Cookies & Corks produces small, boutique boxes of cookies, each bearing three different cookie types designed to pair with one of three wine types: red, white, or sparkling. In each box you’ll find two traditional, sweet cookies, and one savory one — usually something with herbs in it — all designed to pair with wine of a certain color. A legend on the side of the box tells you in more detail what kinds of cookies go with what kind of wine (Cab, Pinot, etc.).

Results are interesting? In tasting through these nine types of cookies I generally found that cookies taste a lot like cookies whether you’re eating them with wine or not — but there were indeed a few that enhanced the experience of the wine-drinking… generally the savory ones.

Some thoughts on each cookie collection follow.

White Wine Cookies & Corks - 13 total Apricot Sage, Peanut Butter Chocolate, and Ginger Molasses cookies. Apricot Sage is actually the least tasty cookie on its own (sage in cookie form is stronger than you’d think), but with a glass of Chardonnay it was a surprisingly good fit. I really liked the PB&Chocolate (two peanut butter cookies with chocolate sandwiched between them) cookies, but the whole affair was so huge it was a bit sloppy and crumbly for a dainty glass of wine. The touch of salt on that cookie: fantastic. Finally there’s Ginger Molasses: A solid and crumbly gingersnap, definitely worthwhile, and probably the best cookie here on its own merits. B+

Sparkling Wine Cookies & Corks – 15 total Zesty Lemon, Parmesan Thyme, and Sea Salt Chocolate Oatmeal cookies. A huge, tart Lemon cookie gets you started, and the Oatmeal cookie, while really salty, is quite delightful. The savory Parmesan Thyme, however, is less cookie than squishy biscuit. Unlike, say, the Apricot Sage cookie, it works less well with or without wine, coming across a bit like an old cheese cracker that’s gone soft. The sweet cookies, however, all seem to work pretty well with sparkling wine, though… and just as well on their own. B+

Red Wine Cookies & Corks - 15 total White Cheddar Rosemary, Shortbread, and Espresso Chocolate Peanut Butter cookies. Chocolate and red wine always work pretty well together, and the Espresso Chocolate Peanut Butter cookie, while a little busy, is a good counterpart to red wine — and better with some juice (which gives the dryish cookie a little moisture) than solo. The shortbread is quite sweet compared to your average Trefoil, with a slight citrus kick, maybe not perfect for red wine but pretty tasty in its own right. Finally there’s the Cheddar Rosemary: Unfortunately these cookies were mostly pulverized by the time they got to me, but the pieces, much like the Parmesan Thyme cookies, bring a big cheesy biscuit character to the party. Overwhelming on their own, they work well enough with wine but overall I preferred the sweeter cookies in this bunch compared to this savory one. A-

about $7 per box / cookiesandcorks.com

Cookies Corks with wine Review: Cookies & Corks    Cookies for Wine Pairing

Tasting Report: Wente Chardonnay

Wente is one of the huge names in California wine, with dozens of bottlings of just about every wine under the sun. Today we tasted through four of Wente’s Chardonnays, from the supermarket blend to the more upscale bottlings, along with Karl Wente, the winery’s chief winemaker and a fifth generation member of the Wente family. Here’s what we thought about each of the four bottlings.

2009 Wente Morning Fog Chardonnay Livermore Valley (pictured) – A very typical, big and buttery Chardonnay, with creamy nut character overwhelming the apple and fig fruit below. This is what people think of when they think of Chardonnay, with all the connotations that implies. Half aged in oak, half in stainless steel — but you wouldn’t  B / $14

2009 Wente Riva Ranch Chardonnay Arroyo Seco Monterey - More of a citrus tone here, but still a buttery, big wine. Likeable and relatively mild in flavor, approachable and easy-drinking. B+ / $18

2010 Wente Eric’s Chardonnay Small Lot Livermore - Very tropical on the nose, huge pineapple notes in the body. The body is restrained, as is the wood influence (which makes sense, because it’s unoaked). More acidity and minerals than most of this roundup — and other Cali Chars. Fun and surprising for a Chardonnay, a definite winner. A- / $22

2009 Wente The Nth Degree Chardonnay Livermore Estate Bottled - Back to the butter and cream, with an oaky powerhouse of a wine. Lots of herbs on the nose — ginger and mint — but the wood takes it away. A return of acidity on the finish is welcome.  B+ / $34

wentevineyards.com

wente morning fog Tasting Report: Wente Chardonnay

Cork vs. Screwcap: Here Comes the Science

There’s nothing quite like the sound of a cork popping out of that fresh bottle of wine, indicating it’s time at last to drink. The “click” of a screwcap seal being broken… well, it just doesn’t do the same thing for the senses.

If Hogue Cellars has its way, you’re soon going to be willing to put the corkscrews away for good. Hogue has long been a screwcap champion, to the point where it has spent tens of thousands of dollars bottling wines with a variety of closures just to see what really works best. It released a study in 2004 that backed screwcapped wines over cork-stoppered ones, and another, even bigger, study released this year, according to Hogue, seals the deal. In fact, it is now moving all of its wine production to screwcap closures permanently.

That may be a hard sell for some, so Hogue showed up in San Francisco recently to try to prove its case firsthand. But first, some science. It turns out not all artificial closures are created equal. The company evaluated seven different types of screwcaps and three artificial (plastic) cork-sized stoppers to figure out, well, that some are great and some are crap.

The details were long enough to fill a two-hour presentation, a 40-page PowerPoint, and an entire website about the issue, but it boils down to this:

  • In the long-term, screwcaps with plastic (aka Saranex) liners were best at maintaining a wine’s flavor (as judged both by expert tasters and SO2 measurements): Other screwcaps (including those with tin liners) let in too much oxygen.
  • Most synthetic stoppers are junk.
  • Natural cork isn’t bad — but it suffers from unreliability; bottles vary quite a bit from one to the next.

If only it were that easy: Even different Saranex screwcap manufacturers vary in quality. And then there’s the issue of headspace — the air trapped in the bottle after the cap is put on. In a corked wine, there’s very little air in there, but in a screwcapped wine, there’s quite a bit: There’s no cork filling up the space that is now empty and full of ambient air. You can fill this space with nitrogen or just let it breathe. (Hogue tested that too and now does that latter.)

The highlight of this event was Hogue putting its money where its mouth is: We tasted a vertical series of six Hogue Chardonnays ($11 bottles), all screwcapped, from vintages 2004 to 2009. Now I’ve had old, cheap, California Chardonnay before and it’s invariably been swill once I uncorked it. Hogue, however, proved this doesn’t have to be the case. Its 2004 was rich, buttery, and just about perfect — reminiscent of lightly aged Burgundy. I liked the ’05 to ’07 bottlings the least, but none of them were bad, proving pretty clearly that screwcaps can truly stand the test of time.

We then turned to reds: Five 2003 Genesis Merlots, all the same wine except for the stopper. Tasted blind, the crowd was asked to pick favorites. Most liked the A and B bottlings best, which were the screwcapped versions of the wine (one with nitrogen added and one without). But two of us (myself included) preferred D. It turned out to be, you guessed it, stoppered with natural cork.

Why did I like it? The A and B wines tasted too young, though a 2003 Merlot should be perfectly drinkable today, this was still tight and tannic, and tough to sip on… even after aerating for hours in the glass. The cork-stoppered wine, however, had a little age on it. Oxygen isn’t always a bad thing, and here it had done a little magic by giving the wine more austerity, more restraint, and better balance. I wasn’t surprised to hear that, but it was disheartening that half the group felt the wine was bad: The bottle their samples had been poured from was corked. Such is life in the world of natural cork, and it’s a sad fact that makes it clear why Hogue has gone the way it did.

So, is a screwcap better than cork? Not necessarily, but it’s certainly nothing to fear. A good cork will work just as well as a good screwcap (look for a white liner inside instead of a metal one) — and there are bad versions of both. How you figure out what you’re getting without opening the bottle, well, that’s a problem for another day.

hoguecellars.com

hogue screwcap vs cork Cork vs. Screwcap: Here Comes the Science

Enjoying Laphroaig Cairdeas Ileach Edition (2011) with Master Distiller John Campbell

Laphroaig, the king of peated Scotch, is not a company that likes to rock the boat. Today, it has just five real bottlings on the market — 10, 18, and 25 year olds, Quarter Cask, and a cask strength version of the 10. That’s it. No fancy finishes. No extra-woody (or, more likely in Laphroaig’s world, extra-peated) versions. This is a distillery that sits on 200 years of tradition, and over lunch with Master Distiller John Campbell, he was deadpan but sanguine about that: It is what it is. People are going to drink Laphroaig, or they won’t, and the company isn’t going to chase the customer with a bunch of hooey.

Campbell didn’t say hooey — he’s a Scotsman through and through — but I knew what he meant.

Still, things are starting to change — however slightly — for Laphroaig, with the release of Cairdeas (pronounced “CAR-chess”) Ileach Edition, a limited edition annual release that was formerly available only to Laphroaig’s “Friends & Family” members — and even then mostly only in Europe.

Cairdeas is a departure for Laphroaig in a lot of ways. It carries no age statement, is bottled at 101 proof, and it comes in a clear bottle instead of Laphroaig’s traditional green ones. Cairdeas means “friendship” in Gaelic, and you’ll likely need a friend in high places to find a bottle of this: Only 3,750 bottles are being produced for the U.S. (it will be sold in just eight states), and at just $60 retail, they are likely to go fast.

The malt is a real winner: Eight years old, according to Campbell, and light as a feather in color. There’s peat on the nose, reminding you this is Laphroaig at heart, but it’s not aggressively smoky, coming across more as a damp mossiness than a trip up the chimney. On the tongue, the peat all but vanishes, revealing floral notes, lots of orange (almost candied), and a sweet, nougat-laden, and warming finish. Peat makes a comeback for the finale, leaving a rumbling, charcoal aftertaste. Amazing balance and perfect on a super wet day (as was the case when I tried it, when a rainfall record was set in S.F.).

We also tried the 10, 18, and 10 year cask strength over the lunch, and while I have a serious soft spot for that lush, honeyed 18 year old, I have to say, this Cairdeas was probably my favorite of the day.

A / $60 / laphroaig.com

Review: The Dalmore Cigar Malt Reserve

Most Scotch whiskys are aged in ex-Bourbon barrels for the majority of their lives. Only at the end are they occasionally finished in oddball barrels, like former sherry or Port casks.

Dalmore’s Cigar Malt — a brand which has been off the market for years now — is an exception to the rule. It spends most of its lifetime (how long is not disclosed) in Oloroso Matusalem sherry butts. The ultimate proportion of these butts in the blend represents 70% of the spirit; the remainder is American white oak.

As the name implies, Cigar Malt was designed to be a companion for the stogie smoker. This, incidentally, is also why it vanished: The stigma about smoking drove Dalmore to rethink the scotch and relabel it as Dalmore Gran Reserva.

Now Cigar Malt is back, but it’s a new spirit, not a re-release of the old one. (And, in fact, it tastes nothing like Gran Reserva. It’s also twice the price.)

The new Cigar Malt Reserve is burly and tough, a malt that indeed feels designed for a Churchill or two. Without said cigar, I regret to inform that Cigar Malt disappoints. The nose is one of corny, young whiskey, to the point where if I didn’t know better I would have assumed this was corn spirit. If you can push past all that you’ll get to the sherry character that Dalmore deservedly trumpets, and you’ll find rich honey and orange notes inside. But is it too much of a good thing? Is all that time in sherry casks responsible for ultimately taking this malt down a road less traveled for a reason?

I look forward to trying this again down the road — particularly side by side with other Dalmore expressions — but for now this is a disappointment from an otherwise stellar distillery.

88 proof. Available later this month.

B- / $125 / thedalmore.com

dalmore cigar malt reserve Review: The Dalmore Cigar Malt Reserve

Tasting Report: Wines of Mendocino, June 2011

Mendocino seems like a sleepy community 100 miles or so away from San Francisco, and once in awhile you might remember a few winemakers are toiling away out there, too. Believe it or not, I learned at this event that over 80 wineries are operating in Mendocino County — most of them open to the public. (In all fairness, it is a big county…)

Lots of great Pinot Noir is being made out there right now, along with the county’s undersung speciality: unoaked (or very lightly oaked) Chardonnay. Here’s a rundown of everything I got my hands on.

Tasting Report: Wines of Mendocino, June 2011

2009 Bonterra Chardonnay / B+ / good acid, fruity

2009 Bonterra Viognier / B-

2008 Bonterra Zinfandel / C+

2006 Bonterra The McNab / B / earthy, rocky finish

2009 Paul Dolan Chardonnay / A- / nice fruit, minimal oak

2009 Paul Dolan Cabernet Sauvignon / A- / one of Mendo’s better cabs

2007 Paul Dolan Deep Red / B / a field blend, unthrilling

2009 Saracina Sauvignon Blanc / A- / tropical mango notes

2010 Saracina The Choir / A / Rousanne and Viognier, delightful

2010 Saracina Chardonnay / B+ / fig notes

2009 Saracina Pinot Noir Anderson / B+ / dense

2007 Saracina Altrea Old Soul / B+

2009 Saracina Zinfandel “Pick and Shovel” / B- / dusty

2007 Baxter Pinot Noir Toulouse Vineyard / B+

2007 Baxter Pinot Noir Oppenlander Vineyard / A / amazing fruit here

2006 Baxter Carignan Caballo Blanco Vineyard / B+

2009 Handley Pinot Grigio / A- / extremely light

2009 Handley Chardonnay / A-

2007 Handley Pinot Noir / A- / earthy and thick

2010 Husch Sauvignon Blanc / A-

2009 Husch Pinot Noir / A- / cocoa notes

2007 Husch Cabernet Sauvignon / B / big, tougher

2009 Londer Pinot Noir Anderson Valley / A / ridiculously velvety

2007 Londer Pinot Noir Parabol / A- / tighter

2007 Londer Pinot Noir Estate / A- / also a bit tight

2010 Phillips Hill Chardonnay / B / mild, unoaked

2010 Phillips Hill Gewurztraminer / B

2009 Phillips Hill Pinot Noir Hinterlands / B / big Burgundy character

2009 Phillips Hill Pinot Noir Mendocino Ridge Valenti / A / tops

2008 Phillips Hill Pinot Noir Oppenlander Vineyard / A-

NV Roederer Anderson Valley Brut / A- / tropical, melon

2002 Roederer L’Ermitage Brut / B+ / yeasty, big mouthfeel, foamy

2009 Foursight Charles Vineyard Sauvignon Blanc / A- / very light

2009 Foursight Anderson Valley Dry Gewurztraminer / B- / slight medicinal finish

2007 Foursight All-In Charles Vineyard Pinot Noir / A-

2009 Foursight Clone 05 Charles Vineyard Pinot Noir / A- / big, tart fruit

2009 Foursight Zero New Oak Charles Vineyard Pinot Noir / A- / young

2009 Foursight Semillon / B-

2007 Graziano Zinfandel / A- / subdued

2006 Graziano Petite Sirah / B+

2006 Graziano Coro Mendocino / B+ / old and new world put together