Monthly Archives: May 2011

Review: Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Bourbon Round One

Explaining exactly what is behind the 12 bottles reviewed below would take me all night. So I’m going to let Buffalo Trace explain its Single Oak Project for itself:

On Friday, April 29th, Buffalo Trace Distillery unveiled its latest endeavor to a select group of spirits writers from around the world; a line up of single tree bourbons it hopes will lead to the world’s perfect bourbon.  Officially called Single Oak Project Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey, this project is an amazing mixture of creativity, patience, ingenuity and dedication.

Beginning in 1999, then Warehouse Manager Ronnie Eddins traveled to the Missouri Ozarks to hand pick 96 trees, consisting of fine grain, medium grain and coarse grain wood, based on the tree’s growth rings. Each type of grain indicates a different growth rate and will yield a different flavor profile.  From there, each tree was cut into a top and a bottom piece, yielding 192 unique sections. Next stop was the lumber yard, where staves were created from each section and were tagged and tracked. The staves were divided into two groups and given different air dried seasonings, 6 months and 12 months.  The air drying allows Mother Nature to break down some of the more harsh flavored characteristics commonly found in wood.

After all the staves were air dried, a single barrel was then created from each tree section, resulting in 192 total barrels.

The next step in the process was to experiment with different char levels of the barrels. Two different char levels were used, a number three and a number four char. (The standard char level for all Buffalo Trace products is a number four char, which is a 55 second burn.)

Then, barrels were filled with one of two different recipes, a wheat and a rye recipe bourbon. To further the variety of experiments, barrels were filled at two different proofs, 105 proof and 125 proof.  And if this wasn’t enough, two completely different warehouses were used, one with a wooden ricks and one with concrete floors.  In total, seven different variables were employed in Buffalo Trace’s ultimate experiment.

And then, the waiting began.  For eight years the Distillery continued with its tracking process, creating intricate databases and coming up with a potential of 1,396 tasting combinations from these 192 barrels!

But the best is yet to come – Buffalo Trace is asking consumers to rate each whiskey they taste online at www.singleoakproject.com and give their feedback. On the website, consumers create a profile and after rating each bottle, will then see the aging details and provenance of each barrel. They can interact with others who have also reviewed the barrel, compare their reviews on the same barrel, and even use it as a learning process for themselves by discovering which characteristics they like in a bourbon to help them select future favorites.

Participants online will earn points after reach review and most importantly, help Buffalo Trace Distillery create the perfect bourbon!

“This has been a painstaking but at the same time, fun project for us,” stated Mark Brown, president and chief executive officer of Buffalo Trace Distillery. “Even after making bourbon here for over 230 years, we still have an insatiable desire to learn, and what better way to do that than to solicit the help of some of our most loyal fans to tell us what they like, why they like it, and then set about making it!”

No matter what the results online show, Buffalo Trace will have a wealth of knowledge about key variables used in making bourbon. At the conclusion of the project the Distillery plans to take the top rated barrel, make more of that product and launch it under the Single Oak Project nameplate.

“Will this project lead us to the Holy Grail of bourbon?” Brown muses, “I don’t know. I hope so, but either way, it sure has been a great ride trying.”

The first release of the Single Oak Project Bourbon is expected to hit stores nationwide in very limited quantities around the end of May. Each release will consist of 12 unique single barrel bourbons. Every case will contain 12 bottles, each from a different barrel. The first release is made up of barrel numbers 3, 4, 35, 36, 67, 68, 99, 100, 131, 132, 163 and 164. Each of these barrels had the same entry proof, seasoning, char level and warehouse aging location. However, the  hope is to identify the differences in taste based on recipe, wood grain size and tree cut as these characteristics varied amongst this group of barrels. There will be a series of releases over the next four years until all of the 192 barrels have been released.  All releases will be packaged in a 375ml bottle. Suggested retail pricing is $46.35.

Got that? So here we have 12 bottles of Bourbon, all made with the same fill proof (125 proof), seasoning (6 months), char (#4), and warehousing (wood floor). All are eight years old. They differ by recipe (either more wheat or more rye), tree cut, and wood grain of the barrels. All are 90 proof when they hit the bottle.

And here is what we thought about all 12 of the first wave, along with information about their “DNA,” which we learned after tasting by stepping through the review process on the Single Oak Project website (a rather lengthy process if you’re sampling 12 whiskeys). If you’re sampling any of these blind, you might consider what follows to be a spoiler!

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #3 – Overwhelming orange notes, young. Not overly sweet, lots of bite. No real wood character. B (rye, top, 16 growth rings/inch, 42 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #4 – Astringent on the tongue and hugely grain-focused. The finish is medicinal, sour, and rough. One of my least favorite of the bunch. C- (rye, bottom, 16 growth rings/inch, 47 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #35 – Rich and creamy, with loads of caramel, coffee, dark chocolate. Wood comes along on the finish, and the whole affair offers a wonderful balance. A favorite — and a surprise; we guessed it was rye-based. A (wheat, top, 17 growth rings/inch, 43 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #36 – Classic Bourbon style, the long finish is smooth but serious. Lush with big caramel and vanilla notes and creamy in the mouth. A little apple pie on the finish. One of the best on the block. A- (wheat, bottom, 17 growth rings/inch, 55 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #67 – A bit astringent, big sweet caramel character. Not much beyond first impressions. B- (rye, top, 12 growth rings/inch, 33 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #68 – Super woody, but shows its charms as you drink it. Some vanilla and spice on the finish. Nothing out of the ordinary. B (rye, bottom, 12 growth rings/inch, 44 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #99 – Sweeter but not terribly nuanced, and not a lot of secondary character. Good, creamy body. Not a whole lot to it but an easy drinker. B+ (wheat, top, 12 growth rings/inch, 35 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #100 – Another easy whiskey, with a little vanilla and round mouthfeel, but not a lot of character. B (wheat, bottom, 12 growth rings/inch, 43 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #131 – Really woody, and far out of balance. Lots of alcohol on this one, with a tough, super woody finish. C (rye, top, 8 growth rings/inch, 42 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #132 – Smooth and delightful, with caramel, vanilla, and spice. Really nice body. Perhaps the favorite of the night. If this is from the top part of the tree that #131′s barrel is from, they’re night and day. A (rye, bottom, 8 growth rings/inch, 65 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #163 – Caramel apple character, with bit of vanilla and a somewhat thin body. Really nice flavor, but the body lacks weight. A- (wheat, top, 9 growth rings/inch, 60 staves/barrel)

Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Barrel #164 – Amazing bite on this, astringent. A little vanilla and caramel on the palate, but the body is thin and unmemorable. B- (wheat, bottom, 9 growth rings/inch, 38 staves/barrel)

And so what did we learn from all of this?

When embarking on this tasting, we were skeptical: We figured the rye vs. wheat recipe would make a big difference between bottles — and it did — but could having a barrel cut from the top of a tree vs. the bottom of a tree, or one with a tighter wood grain (higher growth rings/inch) vs. looser grain (lower rings) make a difference? What about barrel staves? The conventional wisdom (what there is of it) holds that fewer staves equal better barrels (and better whiskey), because the wood planks used to make them are sturdier and higher quality. Narrow staves mean, in theory, that the wood is cheaper, so lots of staves in a barrel is a warning sign… or is it?

Our results were all over the map. Our easy favorite was a wonderful rye, cut from the loosest grained wood in the roundup (8 rings/inch) and with a whopping 65 staves in the barrel — the most in the roundup. If more staves equals lower quality, that didn’t pan out here.

Following that were two wheat whiskeys, one with loose grain (9 rings) and one with very tight (17 rings). Both had very narrow staves, also. While the tight-grained wheat whiskey was preferred over the looser one, both were solid.

But what of the other nine whiskeys? Seven fell into the B range but two were outright misses. Both were rye whiskeys, but none of the other data about the barrels was of much use, falling all over the map. The most notable data point: In general, adjacent barrel numbers (which seem to be from the same tree, one the top and one the bottom) had largely similar notes — but not always.

My hunch? It’s not so much the type of wood the determines the quality of the whiskey as it is the quality of the tree from which the barrel was made. Either that or it’s just dumb luck.

Fascinating stuff. Definitely something to try if you can afford several bottles for comparison.

Update: John Hansell of Malt Advocate weighs in, with similarly mixed opinions — and some different favorites.

$46 each (375ml bottle) / singleoakproject.com

Buffalo Trace Single Oak Project 1st Release Review: Buffalo Trace Distillery Single Oak Project Bourbon Round One

 

Jack Daniel’s Changes Its Label and Bottle

Heresy? The changes are bigger than you’d think. Here’s the press release, and a before & after photo. I have to say, I think JD fans are going to hate this — mainly over the new bottle design.

LYNCHBURG, Tenn., May 16, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — The Jack Daniel Distillery announced today that it is making minor refinements to the familiar Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 bottle to accentuate the bottle’s square shoulders and also to simplify the front and side labels.

The company is quick to note that even though the bottle and label have been refined, the whiskey inside remains unchanged.  The bottle will begin shipping this month and will be on most shelves by July.

“Mr. Jack Daniel was proud of the craftsmanship and care that went into his whiskey and wanted a bottle as unique as its smooth, mellow character,” said John Hayes, Senior Vice President, Managing Director Jack Daniel’s.  ”That’s why in 1895, Jack made the decision to put his whiskey in a square bottle, unlike other whiskeys of his day.  He wanted to make sure his whiskey stood out.  The refinements today are meant to honor Mr. Jack’s desire that his bottle reflect the distinctive character of the whiskey.”

This is not the first time the Jack Daniel’s bottle and label have been updated.  The first refinements go back to Jack Daniel who originally sold his whiskey by the barrel.  He then moved from barrel to jug to the familiar square bottle.  Over the years, during Mr. Jack’s day and after, refinements were made to the bottle and label:  Gold medals were added to the side label as they were won; Lynchburg sayings were added and dropped; and, room was made for more information.  Over time, so many things were added that the label began to look more cluttered than it was under Mr. Jack’s watch, according to the distillery.

“We think Mr. Jack would be proud of the refinements and how they honor his wish that his Old No. 7 whiskey be as distinctive in the bottle as it is in taste,” said Hayes.

PRN12 JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY BOTTLE 1yHigh Jack Daniels Changes Its Label and Bottle

Review: Alex Elman Wines

Sometimes the wines we get aren’t our favorites. But we review them anyway, especially when the story behind them is so lovely.

This line of inexpensive whites and reds from Argentina are created by a young, blind winemaker (Alex Elman, of course) and are produced sustainably (and affordably). The inaugural releases arrive this month on U.S. shelves.

2010 Alex Elman Torrontes Mendoza – Nice, lemony nose, but the body is green, weedy, and unripe. C

2010 Alex Elman Chardonnay Mendoza – Overly buttery, which saps the fruit (evident in the nose) from the palate. Some melon and more lemon charms here, but nothing that will bowl you over. C+

2009 Alex Elman Cabernet Sauvignon Mendoza – Thin and a little weedy, lots of meat and smoke character. Not great. D+

2009 Alex Elman Malbec Mendoza – My favorite of the bunch, which is fitting considering Malbec is essentially Argentina’s national grape. This one has real fruit character, plummy and slightly jammy. Easygoing finish and, at last, balanced. B+

$13 each / aewines.com

alex elman collection wine Review: Alex Elman Wines

Review: Remy Martin 1738 Accord Royal Cognac

I regret to inform the reader that Remy Martin’s new Cognac, 1738 Accord Royal, is not 273 years old.

It is rather a new blend of some 240 eaux de vie, 65% Grande Champagne and 35% Petite Champagne grapes, aged between 4 and 20 years in Limousin oak barrels. The name derives from a 1731 accord from Louis XV, who said that no new grape vines could be planted without royal approval. Remy got such approval seven years later.

Despite the nod to the 18th century, the Cognac is definitely on the young side, with strong wine flavors and big apricot and peach notes. Woodiness comes into play on the finish, with a lightly astringent bite. At the same time, it is balanced throughout with notes of cinnamon, baking spices, and a light dusting of chocolate.

A good entry-level Cognac, if not remarkably different from standard Remy Martin VSOP ($33).

B+ / $50 / remy.com

remy maritn 1738 accord royal Review: Remy Martin 1738 Accord Royal Cognac

Tasting Report: Nicolas Feuillatte Champagnes

Nicolas Feuillatte has appeared a few times in this blog, but at a recent event I had the chance to taste through a wide range of offerings from the upstart Champagne house — it got its start in 1976 but is no the #1 Champagne merchant in France and the #3 seller in the world — from its non-vintage offerings to an ultra-rare Palmes d’Or dating back to 1998.

The event was emceed by the house’s chief winemaker, Jean-Pierre Vincent, who talked about everything Champenoise for hours. (Did you know: Rose Champagne is made through two methods: contact with red grape skins or blending of white and red wines?)

Here are some thoughts on Feuillatte’s nine wines poured at the event.

Tasting Report: Nicolas Feuillatte Champagnes

NV Nicolas Feuillatte Rose Champagne / A- / A blended Champagne, with 20% red wine. Overall mix is 60% Pinot Noir grapes, 30% Pinot Meunier, and 10% Chardonnay. Pleasant, with a light nose and lightly sweet body. Fresh cherries and floral notes.

2004 Nicolas Feuillatte Rose Vintage Champagne / B+ / Also a blend, slightly darker in color. A bit of woody character, with more fizz and a bolder, richer body, though the fruitiness is restrained and the finish is mild.

2004 Nicolas Feuillatte Cuvee 225 Rose Champagne / B- / An experiment: This Champagne uses wine in the blend that has been aged in wood, dulling the fruit with vegetal, tannic character. The effect is to make a fresh wine taste oxidized.

2000 Nicolas Feuillatte Palmes d’Or Rose Champagne / B+ / The top of the line, a wine made pink from skin contact. Yeasty, with distinct Madeira notes. Raisins and prunes on the finish as it fades.

2003 Nicolas Feuillatte Palmes d’Or Rose Champagne / A / A great improvement, although 2003 is thought to be a lesser year for Champagne. A bit darker, but much fresher in aroma, with huge raspberry character that is tempered by those “old wine”/Madeira notes. Sophisticated, with a great balance.

2004 Nicolas Feuillatte Blanc de Blancs Champagne / A- / On to the whites. This classic, all-Chardonnay sparkler is solid, with fresh apple notes. Tart, with lots of minerals.

2003 Nicolas Feuillatte Cuvee 225 Champagne / B / The white version of the funky “aged-in-wood” experiment works a bit better than the Rose, but it still comes across as oxidized and funky.

1998 Nicolas Feuillatte Palmes d’Or Champagne / A / A nose full of yeast fades to reveal a pleasant sweetness that’s holding up well. An earthy backbone balances the fruit on the tongue. A classic. I liked this today much more than the last time I reviewed it.

feuillatte.com

nicolas feuillatte Tasting Report: Nicolas Feuillatte Champagnes

Review: iX MiXers

One way to prevent a hangover is to try any number of hangover prevention products before you go out. (I’ve reviewed dozens of them on this blog.)

Another idea: Drop your poison into a hangover-stopping mixer directly, bypassing the need for a preliminary (and often nasty-tasting) pre-cure.

That’s the idea with iX MiXers, a pair of 250ml cans of soda-like mixers: Naturally flavored, lightly sweetened (well, 20 grams of sugar worth), and lightly carbonated… and, presumably, filled with anti-hangover vitamins, minerals, and those ever-important electrolytes.

It’s not entirely clear what those additives comprise: There is no list of post-modern herbs and long-chain chemicals in the ingredients list, but  a can will give you 20% of a daily dose each of Vitamins A, B6, B12, Zinc, Niacin, and Pantothenic Acid, plus 60% of your daily Chromium needs. Everything else in the ingredients is either a preservative, sweetener, flavor, or a coloring agent. Oh, and water. I can’t comment on iX’s hangover prevention claims — I don’t think it’s possible to drink enough cocktails made with iX to even become drunk, much less hung over — but a day after trying them out I can say I feel fine.

iX is available in two flavors:

iX Citrus looks lemony from the yellow can, but the flavor is more Orange Crush. It’s fizzier than the “lightly carbonated” label would make you believe, and sweeter, too. On its own or in a mix, it’s fine, but the resulting 7 and 7, say, turns out more like a 7 and Sunkist. If you’re a fan of orange sodas, this will fit right in, but I find it too reminiscent of my youth for enjoyment in a cocktail. B

iX Berrie — spelled thusly — is a pretty clear play for Red Bull, a big berry character, almost candy-like. A little more easy-drinking than the Citrus version, but after a full can the strawberry/raspberry/Jolly Rancher mix gets a little cloying. It’s a bit more refreshing than the Citrus version, though it makes me wonder why iX didn’t go with some vitaminized classics: Cola and lemon-lime? Hmmm, business idea! B+

about $1 per 250ml can / ixmixer.com

iX MiXer Review: iX MiXers

Top 10 Geek Beers

Love this story about the geekiest beers on the planet, from Bachelors Degree Online (which apparently also has a lot to say about booze).

My favorite on the list is actually #10:

Sapporo Space Barley: Japanese brewery Sapporo holds the honor of making the first beer with space-grown ingredients. The barley that’s used for Sapporo’s Space Barley was grown aboard the International Space Station, and offers a distinctive roasted barley flavor. Space beer doesn’t come cheap, though, with a reported price of about $115 per six pack.

Check out the link for the full list!

Review: Oddball Whiskeys of Koval Distillery

To call Koval Distillery an “artisan” operation would be the understatement of the year. Koval, based in Chicago, is a microdistillery of the bizarre: It takes organic, single grains — not just wheat and rye, but stuff like oats, millet, and spelt — and makes booze out of them. Bottled without aging (under the Koval brand), and with minimal barrel time (as Lion’s Pride, in “regular” and “dark” versions, both aged less than two years but variable in color due to the types of barrels used). The batches are tiny, typically about 10 gallons each (that’s just 50 bottles).

The company also makes a few liqueurs, vodka, brandy, and more.

We were fortunate to get a sampling of Koval’s products from its 20 or 30 bottlings to see just what the hell is going on in this oddball distillery in Chi-town.

Koval Rye Chicago White Whiskey – Distilled from organic rye and unaged. You would expect the harshest of the harsh but no, Koval Rye Chicago is surprisingly easygoing. Not a lot of nuance on the nose, but the body offers notes of lemon, vanilla, and spice before finally fading into that familiar white whiskey funk. Not a bad effort for an unaged spirit. 80 proof. B / $40

Koval Raksi Millet White Whiskey – Millet is a grain primarily used for animal feed. This is probably the only whiskey I will ever have made from this raw material (organic, natch), and that might be for the best. Pungent and funky, the nose is one of intense, old hay, and the body only hints at sweetness. The finish offers huge, young whiskey skunkiness and, surprisingly, a hint of nougat and marshmallow. Bizarre and intriguing… if nothing I would drink every day. 80 proof. B- / $40

Lion’s Pride Rye – Though it’s just the palest gold in color, the light hand of age has had an impact on the spirit, giving it a much bolder flavor profile and nose, and a nuance that surpasses its white cousin. Here the rye is tempered with bigger vanilla and chocolate notes — especially evident in the finish — but the hard core remains toughened by a lack of time. The sweet finish is an intriguing hint at what a “finished” version of this whiskey might taste like. 80 proof. B+ / $58

Lion’s Pride Dark Millet - Again, it’s aged just two years or less, but quite a bit darker in color considering that time. (Koval does not use any artificial colors in its products.) It’s still “millet” through and through, mind you: Incredible pungent, with a licorice, herbal, and intense wood/tobacco character. But that millet funk is so powerful it simply can’t be cut with a knife. 80 proof. B- / $62

Koval Ginger Liqueur – Made, of course, from organic ginger. Very sweet, bright, and mild. If you’re looking for intense ginger flavor, seek elsewhere: This is the Schweppes of ginger liqueurs, so easy drinking you could give it to your cat. I see it bet as something to splash into another cocktail for just a hint of ginger flavor plus a touch of sweetness. 40 proof. B / $35

koval-distillery.com

Review: Lixir Vodka

Wow, a powerful gut-puncher of a vodka from Michigan, artisanal, organic, and all that good stuff. Distilled from local (Michigan) red wheat, plus a little rye and barley from Minnesota, it goes through a continuous column still, purportedly a total of 88 times.

It translates bizarrely: Not into a smooth operator with all the nuance filtered out but rather into one of the most intensely flavorful vodkas I’ve ever encountered. The character is filled with mint and nut flavors — pistachio, hazelnut, and almond melding into the distinct impression of Amaretto and Frangelico liqueurs. The body is huge, dessert like, and filling.

The finish is rough, driven in part by the 88 proof alcohol level but more, I imagine, from the exotic mashbill that goes into this spirit. I love that producers are working with local, organic raw ingredients, but my feeling is that Lixir would actually do better if it was making a whiskey, where flavors like this would give it a head start.

B / $40 / vlixir.com

lixir vodka Review: Lixir Vodka

Review: Bootlegger 21 Vodka

The speakeasy craze has migrated from the bar world to spirits makers: From New York’s Prohibition Distillery comes this new vodka, Bootlegger 21. Its Old School aspirations aren’t easy to miss: From the retro paper label to the etched, green-glass bottle, Bootlegger will look right at home next to your rotary dial telephone.

It takes some time cutting through the rhetoric about how Prohibition inspired this product — which was actually created in 2009 by a couple of industry upstarts — to figure out how it was made. Distilled from corn in the New York Hudson Valley, it is distilled six times and bottled at 80 proof.

The results are at least better than you could probably get from real bootleggers. Funky and rough, the corn base is evident, giving Bootlegger a kind of white whiskey character that makes it far from “neutral” spirit. Medicinal character is the main impression, cut with some very light sweetness. There’s plenty of herbal character in there too, but it’s muddy and a little out of balance all told, the finish as lasting as it is biting.

Aka Bootlegger 21 New York Vodka.

B- / $26 / prohibitiondistillery.com

bootlegger 21 vodka Review: Bootlegger 21 Vodka